Asteroid Watch · SpaceSift

START HERE

The live queue in three questions.

01 · RIGHT NOWWhich candidates are most likely real?Top of the ranking: CEWH582 (0.93), 6K72D21 (0.90), CEV1Y22 (0.90).See the ranked queue → 02 · WHEREWhere are they in the sky?108 candidates on the confirmation page; 108 still need follow-up observations.Open the sky map → 03 · HOW SURECan this ranking be trusted?Tested on candidates it had never seen, with its errors counted and its limits stated.Read the evaluation →

IN PLAIN WORDS

Every night, survey telescopes flag possible new near-Earth asteroids and post them to the NEO Confirmation Page. Astronomers must observe them again within days, or their orbits become too uncertain and they are lost. Only about half turn out to be real; the rest are camera artifacts, satellites, stars or ordinary main-belt asteroids.

The ranking puts the likeliest real ones first, so scarce telescope time goes where it matters. P(real NEO) is the chance a candidate is a genuine near-Earth object, not the chance of hitting Earth. No candidate here has an impact assessment; known impact risks are in NASA's Sentry table further down.

108

candidates on the page now

captured 13 Oct 2026, 00:08 UTC · rescored twice a day

0.93

ROC-AUC on later candidates

digest2 alone 0.70 · tested on 344 candidates posted after 2026-09-19, trained on 1031 earlier ones

39%

junk excluded at ≥99% NEO recall

same test · digest2 alone 25% · benchmark 80%

1375

model trained on

labeled candidates · last retrained 12 Oct 2026 · retrained every Monday

3368

outcomes archived

since 2026-05-16

LIVE · THE RANKING

The confirmation queue, ranked

BEFORE YOU ACT ON THIS RANKING

It ranks better than the digest2 score alone (ROC-AUC 0.93 vs 0.70, tested on 344 candidates posted after 2026-09-19, trained on 1031 earlier ones), but at the strict setting that keeps ≥99% of real NEOs it drops only 39% of junk (digest2 alone: 25%).
Probabilities are not calibrated: use them to order follow-up, not as odds.
Labels are noisy: some candidates marked “not confirmed” were real NEOs that were simply lost.
Trained on 1375 candidates (last retrained 12 Oct 2026; retrained every Monday); unusual candidates unlike past ones may be scored poorly.
Not an impact forecast: a high score means “probably a real near-Earth object”, nothing about hitting Earth.

Full evaluation →

#?	desig?	P(real NEO)?	follow-up?	~size?	digest2?	V?	H?	obs?	arc d?	unseen d?
1	CEWH582	0.93	Needs follow-up	135 m	100	21.1	22.1	13	0.16	0.169
2	6K72D21	0.90	Needs follow-up	12 m	98	20.8	27.3	12	0.13	0.166
3	CEV1Y22	0.90	Needs follow-up	12 m	98	22.0	27.3	8	0.13	0.143
4	CEWQPT2	0.89	Needs follow-up	141 m ▲	100	21.2	22.0	7	0.1	0.1
5	gb00874	0.89	Needs follow-up	31 m	98	19.2	25.3	9	0.12	0.015
6	Sar2949	0.89	Needs follow-up	26 m	100	20.0	25.7	15	0.05	0.122
7	CEW2VG2	0.89	Needs follow-up	2 m	98	21.0	31.5	13	0.09	0.132
8	C1GKEN5	0.89	Needs follow-up	27 m	100	21.9	25.6	8	0.04	0.027
9	CEWQ9D2	0.88	Needs follow-up	178 m ▲	98	20.6	21.5	9	0.13	0.081
10	C1GVTW5	0.88	Needs follow-up	10 m	98	22.7	27.8	8	0.11	0.115
11	C1GR0W5	0.87	Needs follow-up	15 m	99	21.7	26.9	10	0.07	0.125
12	C1GUXM5	0.87	Needs follow-up	74 m	100	22.4	23.4	7	0.04	0.022
13	C1GGUC5	0.86	Needs follow-up	17 m	100	23.0	26.6	8	0.06	0.149
14	C1GK9J5	0.84	Needs follow-up	8 m	100	22.3	28.2	6	0.05	0.049
15	gb00873	0.84	Needs follow-up	1 m	98	19.3	32.0	9	0.14	0.019
16	P12rfh9	0.84	Needs follow-up	78 m	100	21.8	23.3	6	0.06	0.365
17	P22rf9Z	0.84	Needs follow-up	49 m	100	20.9	24.3	3	0.04	0.374
18	C1GTPF5	0.82	Needs follow-up	3 m	100	22.6	30.4	7	0.06	0.08
19	P12rffl	0.81	Needs follow-up	162 m ▲	100	20.1	21.7	3	0.03	0.122
20	C1GWWQ5	0.81	Needs follow-up	20 m	97	22.4	26.2	8	0.08	0.061
21	XL1011E	0.81	Needs follow-up	26 m	98	19.0	25.7	5	0.67	0.02
22	P12qRD2	0.80	Needs follow-up	107 m	96	22.1	22.6	6	0.1	0.334
23	P22rf9X	0.78	Needs follow-up	135 m	100	21.7	22.1	4	0.04	0.376
24	TKO0004	0.77	Needs follow-up	27 m	93	17.7	25.6	16	0.65	0.094
25	P22rdm1	0.77	Needs follow-up	30 m	100	21.1	25.4	3	0.01	0.136
26	P12rdpK	0.72	Needs follow-up	62 m	100	20.4	23.8	3	0.02	0.088
27	P22rfcq	0.71	Needs follow-up	295 m ▲	97	21.6	20.4	3	0.02	0.385
28	C1GLQL5	0.70	Needs follow-up	214 m ▲	99	22.3	21.1	6	0.05	0.033
29	P22pKXS	0.70	Needs follow-up	148 m ▲	100	21.4	21.9	3	0.03	0.381
30	P22rdnk	0.68	Needs follow-up	98 m	99	21.5	22.8	3	0.02	0.097
31	P12r97j	0.68	Needs follow-up	162 m ▲	100	21.3	21.7	5	0.08	0.279
32	P22oVrz	0.67	Needs follow-up	89 m	100	19.9	23.0	3	0.02	0.493
33	P22r95c	0.62	Needs follow-up	295 m ▲	94	21.2	20.4	5	0.1	0.313
34	P22qRmb	0.57	Needs follow-up	257 m ▲	100	21.8	20.7	4	0.03	0.899
35	C1GTPE5	0.57	Needs follow-up	129 m	95	22.1	22.2	8	0.06	0.083
36	C1GYVP5	0.53	Needs follow-up	112 m	100	22.3	22.5	4	0.01	0.016
37	C1GKJ45	0.52	Needs follow-up	21 m	100	22.9	26.1	4	0.02	0.058
38	orA6297	0.45	Needs follow-up	62 m	100	20.6	23.8	3	0.02	0.513
39	C1GKKV5	0.44	Needs follow-up	31 m	100	23.3	25.3	4	0.02	0.055
40	C46NWU1	0.41	Needs follow-up	1 m	100	17.8	32.1	10	0.06	0.167
41	CAUTVXZ	0.41	Needs follow-up	4 m	100	21.2	29.8	4	0.02	1.175
42	SWAN26Q	0.40	Going stale	23.5 km ▲	61	10.9	10.9	14	26.34	6.718
43	CARD7TZ	0.39	Needs follow-up	2 m	100	30.7	31.3	4	0.02	1.141
44	CAUTVTZ	0.36	Needs follow-up	12 m	100	21.4	27.3	4	0.03	1.462
45	C1GWP85	0.36	Needs follow-up	107 m	93	21.6	22.6	9	0.11	0.052
46	A11HZcx	0.35	Needs follow-up	102 m	100	18.5	22.7	4	0.03	0.358
47	A11HUyG	0.32	Needs follow-up	8 m	100	19.5	28.3	4	0.07	0.419
48	C1GYJ95	0.32	Needs follow-up	155 m ▲	89	22.6	21.8	8	0.05	0.006
49	C1GTXK5	0.32	Needs follow-up	81 m	85	22.9	23.2	8	0.07	0.075
50	C1GYW75	0.32	Needs follow-up	26 m	80	22.6	25.7	4	0.01	0.014
51	C1GR325	0.31	Needs follow-up	170 m ▲	89	22.3	21.6	6	0.06	0.137
52	CANPMAZ	0.29	Needs follow-up	1.6 km ▲	100	22.4	16.7	4	0.02	1.384
53	JAN3074	0.29	Needs follow-up	214 m ▲	100	20.9	21.1	3	0.01	0.71
54	CAUTVQZ	0.25	Needs follow-up	19 m	100	23.2	26.4	4	0.02	1.603
55	C1M0JJP	0.24	Needs follow-up	5.1 km ▲	100	21.2	14.2	4	0.02	0.36
56	X91216	0.23	Needs follow-up	447 m ▲	100	19.6	19.5	3	0.03	0.304
57	CARD7VZ	0.21	Needs follow-up	17 m	100	21.8	26.6	4	0.02	2.145
58	A11HAVq	0.21	Needs follow-up	538 m ▲	100	19.4	19.1	4	0.04	0.082
59	ZTF10Gb	0.18	Needs follow-up	26 m	100	20.0	25.7	4	0.06	1.278
60	P12r4oE	0.17	Needs follow-up	339 m ▲	84	22.0	20.1	4	0.03	0.098
61	ZTF10Gh	0.15	Needs follow-up	1 m	100	18.4	32.6	8	0.02	0.586
62	ZTF10Gf	0.14	Needs follow-up	14 m	100	25.6	27.1	4	0.0	0.565
63	P22rdnn	0.14	Needs follow-up	235 m ▲	98	21.8	20.9	4	0.03	0.092
64	P22r4mo	0.14	Needs follow-up	123 m	78	21.5	22.3	4	0.03	0.056
65	N117108	0.13	Going stale	11 m	100	99.9	27.6	4	0.11	5.692
66	A11FPxB	0.12	Needs follow-up	2.8 km ▲	100	19.1	15.5	4	0.02	0.536
67	CEVQWE2	0.12	Needs follow-up	282 m ▲	100	21.1	20.5	3	0.01	0.528
68	C1GVZG5	0.11	Needs follow-up	235 m ▲	64	23.0	20.9	6	0.1	0.088
69	P22rfgZ	0.11	Needs follow-up	468 m ▲	100	21.1	19.4	6	0.12	0.376
70	TKO0003	0.11	Needs follow-up	10 m	100	18.5	27.7	4	0.06	0.78
71	P12rfgP	0.11	Needs follow-up	141 m ▲	10	21.2	22.0	2	0.01	0.116
72	C1GQWZ5	0.11	Needs follow-up	282 m ▲	84	22.2	20.5	6	0.1	0.126
73	C1GWFF5	0.10	Needs follow-up	214 m ▲	67	22.7	21.1	7	0.05	0.11
74	P12r4oO	0.10	Needs follow-up	195 m ▲	66	22.2	21.3	4	0.03	0.09
75	C1GHX65	0.10	Needs follow-up	246 m ▲	100	22.2	20.8	3	0.01	1.128
76	P12r97k	0.09	Needs follow-up	447 m ▲	88	21.8	19.5	6	0.09	0.281
77	C1GLFL5	0.09	Needs follow-up	204 m ▲	70	21.6	21.2	4	0.02	0.064
78	X91229	0.09	Needs follow-up	269 m ▲	96	21.4	20.6	3	0.02	0.855
79	P12r4oN	0.09	Needs follow-up	235 m ▲	74	22.3	20.9	4	0.03	0.49
80	P12rf9w	0.09	Needs follow-up	118 m	55	21.7	22.4	3	0.04	0.377
81	P22qZTc	0.09	Needs follow-up	7.1 km ▲	100	21.6	13.5	3	0.02	0.146
82	P12r4oM	0.08	Needs follow-up	5.1 km ▲	71	22.0	14.2	3	0.02	0.097
83	CEUPDC2	0.07	Needs follow-up	170 m ▲	77	21.9	21.6	3	0.02	0.184
84	P12rfgJ	0.07	Needs follow-up	178 m ▲	77	21.6	21.5	4	0.04	0.109
85	P22rf9W	0.07	Needs follow-up	490 m ▲	93	21.5	19.3	3	0.03	0.332
86	P12r4oK	0.07	Needs follow-up	3.9 km ▲	66	22.4	14.8	3	0.03	0.096
87	P12qRUu	0.07	Needs follow-up	339 m ▲	74	21.2	20.1	4	0.04	0.266
88	P12qGDT	0.07	Needs follow-up	490 m ▲	77	21.5	19.3	6	0.1	0.378
89	P12r4oH	0.07	Needs follow-up	4.1 km ▲	79	22.0	14.7	3	0.02	0.099
90	C1MD3EP	0.07	Needs follow-up	324 m ▲	73	23.3	20.2	4	0.02	0.04
91	ZTF10Ge	0.07	Needs follow-up	14 m	100	19.1	27.0	4	0.03	1.244
92	P12r4oL	0.07	Needs follow-up	2.0 km ▲	72	22.4	16.2	3	0.02	0.099
93	P12r01o	0.06	Needs follow-up	4.1 km ▲	78	22.2	14.7	3	0.02	0.11
94	C1LT2DP	0.06	Going stale	852 m ▲	100	21.2	18.1	4	0.02	10.276
95	P12r4oI	0.05	Needs follow-up	677 m ▲	67	21.6	18.6	3	0.03	0.496
96	CEVT4K2	0.05	Needs follow-up	10.7 km ▲	84	21.3	12.6	8	0.12	0.304
97	C1GKQ35	0.05	Needs follow-up	355 m ▲	79	22.2	20.0	3	0.02	0.057
98	P22rfeM	0.05	Needs follow-up	852 m ▲	57	20.4	18.1	4	0.03	0.121
99	P12pwoA	0.04	Needs follow-up	2.7 km ▲	30	20.4	15.6	4	0.02	0.148
100	P22oLCM	0.04	Needs follow-up	538 m ▲	71	21.3	19.1	4	0.04	0.33
101	orA6108	0.04	Needs follow-up	1.3 km ▲	79	21.1	17.2	3	0.02	0.318
102	P22rhmw	0.04	Needs follow-up	513 m ▲	86	21.2	19.2	3	0.04	0.405
103	P12qGDR	0.03	Needs follow-up	538 m ▲	76	20.8	19.1	6	0.1	0.38
104	P22rhq5	0.03	Needs follow-up	538 m ▲	85	20.8	19.1	4	0.04	0.464
105	A11InDq	0.03	Needs follow-up	3.1 km ▲	62	14.3	15.3	4	0.04	0.135
106	P12rf9u	0.03	Needs follow-up	12.9 km ▲	71	20.8	12.2	3	0.03	0.384
107	P12qfMj	0.03	Needs follow-up	3.1 km ▲	73	20.8	15.3	4	0.03	0.429
108	P22r96v	0.03	Needs follow-up	1.8 km ▲	40	21.1	16.5	6	0.08	0.283

Model: lightgbm_dart_time_split_v4_first_posting trained on 1375 labeled objects. Use the scores to order follow-up, not as calibrated odds or impact risk. Green ≥0.8, amber ≥0.4.
Follow-up status: Needs follow-up = fresh single-night candidate, no one's tracked it yet · Being tracked = multi-night arc, seen recently · Going stale = not seen in >3 days, at risk of loss.

LIVE · THE SKY

Where they are right now

likely real (≥0.8)uncertain (0.4–0.8)probably not (<0.4)estimated since last seenecliptic

Each dot is a candidate at its estimated position right now (right ascension and declination, the sky's longitude and latitude). Bigger and greener means more likely real; labels mark the top targets. The dashed pink line is the ecliptic, where ordinary main-belt asteroids cluster, so candidates far from it are more interesting. The faint solid line is each object's measured path across our snapshots; the dashed stretch is extrapolated from its last measured motion, assuming a straight line, so it grows less certain with time (dots fade after 7 days). That growing uncertainty is exactly how unconfirmed objects get lost. Hover a dot for details.

EVALUATION · ON CANDIDATES IT NEVER SAW

Is the model any good?

Yes, at ranking: on candidates it had never seen, posted after it was trained, it ranked real near-Earth objects above junk better than the digest2 score alone (ROC-AUC 0.93 vs 0.70). At a cut-off that keeps 95% of real ones, it threw out 65% of the junk; digest2 alone threw out 37%.

Full held-out evaluation: confusion matrices, confidence intervals, calibration

Trained on candidates discovered 2026-06-20.4–2026-09-19.2 (1031), tested once on the 344 later candidates (2026-09-19.2–2026-10-11.4, 212 real NEOs). The cut-off score was chosen on the training period to keep 95% of real NEOs, then applied unchanged.

	real NEOs kept	real NEOs missed	junk kept	junk excluded	NEO recall	junk excluded
Model	201	11	46	86	95%	65%
digest2 score alone	202	10	83	49	95%	37%

ROC-AUC 0.93 (95% CI 0.89–0.95) vs 0.70 for digest2 alone (difference CI +0.17 to +0.28). Calibration: Brier score 0.108 (lower is better; always guessing the base rate scores 0.258).

Does “0.8” mean 80%? (reliability table)

predicted	n	mean predicted	actually NEO
0.0–0.2	84	0.09	0.11
0.2–0.4	33	0.31	0.21
0.4–0.6	30	0.48	0.67
0.6–0.8	66	0.72	0.74
0.8–1.0	131	0.88	0.97

Inputs are only what is known when a candidate is first posted. An earlier version also used how each candidate evolved on the page until it left, which leaks the outcome and inflated the score; see the evidence page.

CONTEXT · KNOWN IMPACT RISKS

Impact watch: NASA Sentry

object	size	impact odds	when	palermo
29075 (1950 DA)	1.3 km	1 in 2,753	2880-2880	-0.95
101955 Bennu (1999 RQ36)	490 m	1 in 1,749	2178-2290	-1.4
(2008 JL3)	29 m	1 in 6,031	2027-2122	-2.38
(1979 XB)	660 m	1 in 1,174,376	2056-2113	-2.69
(2000 SG344)	37 m	1 in 365	2069-2122	-2.76
(2010 RF12)	7 m	1 in 10	2095-2122	-2.96
(2007 FT3)	341 m	1 in 1,291,265	2030-2119	-3.0
(2022 PX1)	120 m	1 in 309,502	2040-2040	-3.07

The highest-ranked known impact risks, from JPL's Sentry monitor (as of 2026-10-13 00:08 UTC). Palermo scale is log₁₀ risk vs. background: −2 ≈ 1% of background risk; 0 would equal it — nothing known is close. None of these merit worry today; they merit tracking, which is the point of this whole pipeline: the dangerous one is the one nobody has found yet.

CONTEXT · WHAT HAPPENED TO PAST CANDIDATES

Outcome archive

class	n
neo	1602
designated_other	769
was_not_confirmed	508
does_not_exist	169
was_not_a_minor_planet	164
linked	105
comet	32
was_suspected_artificial	19

"neo" = confirmed via discovery MPEC. Negatives accrue from live capture; designated_other are mostly main-belt identifications.

Tracked objects archive (74)

#?	desig?	P(real NEO)?	~size?	digest2?	V?	H?	obs?	arc d?	unseen d?
1	X89853	0.91	43 m	100	20.3	24.6	8	2.57	0.317
2	P12nXcf	0.91	56 m	100	21.3	24.0	17	1.02	1.428
3	c1gkj45	0.91	47 m	100	21.8	24.4	8	2.22	0.447
4	WMT0006	0.91	65 m	92	21.3	23.7	20	1.03	0.505
5	P12onNt	0.91	32 m	100	20.1	25.2	10	1.85	0.561
6	P12o4v9	0.90	186 m ▲	84	20.8	21.4	16	3.16	0.355
7	ZTF10G6	0.90	17 m	76	19.8	26.6	16	1.76	0.436
8	A11F0Hv	0.89	11 m	86	17.2	27.6	18	5.14	0.295
9	ZTF10Ft	0.89	30 m	81	18.0	25.4	20	2.82	0.336
10	A11Eq8v	0.89	30 m	100	18.5	25.4	10	2.05	0.989
11	P12o0Y1	0.88	118 m	100	21.3	22.4	12	18.41	0.995
12	P12omkz	0.87	59 m	100	21.3	23.9	13	6.97	1.391
13	P12nXce	0.84	178 m ▲	100	21.1	21.5	9	1.02	1.433
14	S001621	0.84	162 m ▲	100	20.6	21.7	8	1.89	0.831
15	W2nCdO	0.84	17 m	79	23.7	26.6	14	19.01	1.535
16	P12nXcA	0.81	102 m	80	20.0	22.7	15	1.76	0.699
17	CET8LV2	0.81	155 m ▲	100	20.6	21.8	7	8.95	0.226
18	P22pL3X	0.81	98 m	100	21.9	22.8	10	4.73	0.566
19	CEQCZT2	0.77	257 m ▲	100	21.0	20.7	33	5.97	1.326
20	MRfB109	0.76	195 m ▲	100	21.4	21.3	6	3.07	0.926
21	C46K1R1	0.71	1.6 km ▲	100	18.4	16.8	85	1.12	0.19
22	OP50643	0.70	129 m	96	21.7	22.2	12	14.84	0.424
23	MP95354	0.69	170 m ▲	100	21.6	21.6	6	4.1	0.946
24	MRjH966	0.61	68 m	100	22.3	23.6	6	5.07	1.054
25	6JD4321	0.59	235 m ▲	82	19.8	20.9	21	1.0	0.436
26	P22qZVm	0.57	339 m ▲	87	20.5	20.1	4	16.11	0.136
27	MSoO353	0.47	68 m	100	22.3	23.6	6	4.06	1.098
28	P12oZh2	0.39	355 m ▲	24	21.9	20.0	14	652.04	0.21
29	P22r91d	0.37	16 m	74	18.8	26.7	25	23.11	0.038
30	P12pwAX	0.37	135 m	94	21.2	22.1	7	1.19	0.352
31	P22q6aD	0.37	490 m ▲	100	21.9	19.3	11	1.9	0.319
32	P22p4ww	0.32	129 m	72	20.1	22.2	11	4.84	0.372
33	P12p4HH	0.32	186 m ▲	91	21.5	21.4	11	14.08	0.154
34	C1GNVV5	0.23	282 m ▲	52	22.5	20.5	11	15.01	0.199
35	P12onSk	0.21	246 m ▲	87	21.3	20.8	6	1.06	0.259
36	CEW3UY2	0.19	563 m ▲	31	21.2	19.0	25	954.08	0.1
37	P12qZLd	0.17	563 m ▲	30	21.6	19.0	8	500.72	0.25
38	MQJ9246	0.14	269 m ▲	85	22.0	20.6	11	6.62	0.345
39	MQM9799	0.13	408 m ▲	60	21.6	19.7	6	6.04	0.876
40	P22orOo	0.12	309 m ▲	98	21.2	20.3	14	4.14	0.849
41	P12oVRq	0.11	408 m ▲	87	21.8	19.7	7	18.92	0.372
42	P12pfqZ	0.10	257 m ▲	72	21.2	20.7	7	5.0	0.344
43	MSnM459	0.10	204 m ▲	43	22.3	21.2	6	6.05	0.934
44	P22ooQe	0.10	892 m ▲	10	21.8	18.0	32	689.26	0.28
45	P12o4vF	0.09	468 m ▲	100	21.9	19.4	7	1.01	1.392
46	P22pRo5	0.09	372 m ▲	41	21.1	19.9	9	7.1	0.285
47	Sar2919	0.09	355 m ▲	42	21.2	20.0	20	8.75	0.732
48	P12ooQS	0.09	246 m ▲	74	21.8	20.8	14	23.11	0.233
49	P22nTNT	0.09	563 m ▲	10	21.0	19.0	24	2.71	1.786
50	P22nTLB	0.09	427 m ▲	21	22.2	19.6	20	2.87	1.779
51	gb00855	0.09	513 m ▲	27	20.4	19.2	27	2.73	0.407
52	P22pFdc	0.09	468 m ▲	92	21.0	19.4	8	25.06	0.216
53	MSkK094	0.08	112 m	69	21.9	22.5	4	4.08	1.616
54	C1GFKW5	0.07	355 m ▲	41	21.5	20.0	12	32.01	0.164
55	P12oAWX	0.07	339 m ▲	58	21.0	20.1	5	15.94	0.302
56	MSoN867	0.07	324 m ▲	37	21.3	20.2	13	14.48	0.994
57	P12omkc	0.06	269 m ▲	71	21.0	20.6	7	2.02	0.388
58	MRV8005	0.06	339 m ▲	69	20.8	20.1	4	6.09	0.593
59	Arms083	0.06	3.7 km ▲	86	20.6	14.9	12	2.25	0.433
60	MAS0006	0.05	49.0 km ▲	35	20.3	9.3	64	15.03	0.41
61	P12oDgH	0.05	677 m ▲	10	21.8	18.6	7	2.8	0.19
62	P22ooQf	0.05	892 m ▲	10	21.0	18.0	35	764.03	0.3
63	P22qMeV	0.04	490 m ▲	40	20.6	19.3	10	3.09	0.601
64	P12o4vl	0.04	709 m ▲	100	20.7	18.5	7	1.0	1.403
65	P12qq3M	0.04	1.3 km ▲	55	20.6	17.2	8	2.2	0.214
66	P12pEtX	0.04	742 m ▲	72	21.1	18.4	6	21.03	0.794
67	XA9yiXA	0.04	563 m ▲	10	20.0	19.0	46	459.97	0.61
68	RMM2026	0.04	589 m ▲	35	21.7	18.9	28	26.53	0.306
69	P22pL42	0.04	646 m ▲	34	20.3	18.7	14	32.55	0.429
70	P12onNw	0.04	13.5 km ▲	35	20.6	12.1	17	3.16	1.405
71	P22oEGl	0.03	1.4 km ▲	59	21.2	17.1	8	28.03	0.731
72	P12pBjI	0.03	513 m ▲	65	20.7	19.2	8	26.93	0.348
73	P12o4vm	0.03	563 m ▲	47	20.6	19.0	14	2.13	1.396
74	P12qMqy	0.03	538 m ▲	10	21.4	19.1	15	27.15	0.299

Every candidate our capture has ever seen reach being tracked (a multi-night arc with recent follow-up), kept here so they aren't lost when they roll off the live NEO Confirmation Page and out of the queue above. 74 objects, ranked by model P(real NEO). Sourced from outputs/daily_vetting.csv; unseen-d is days since last observation.